EeeBox PC EB1012 - Pocket format High Definition entertainment | Laptops

EeeBox PC EB1012 - Pocket format High Definition entertainment - Benchmark continued

Wednesday, 02 December 2009 08:23 Laptopfreak

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2914

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2915

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2914

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2915

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2914

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 2915

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/laptop-review.eu/public_html/components/com_sh404sef/sef_ext/com_content.php on line 39

Article Index
EeeBox PC EB1012 - Pocket format High Definition entertainment
Construction
Configuration
Software
Software continued
Benchmark
Benchmark continued
Conclusion
All Pages

Page 7 of 8

Having looked at 2D we will now examine 3D performance. 3DGrapics Mark is shown below:

Here you can see that the Nvidia ION chip in the Asus EB1012 is better than the ATI Radeon HD2400 when it comes to handling both simple and complex 3D graphics. The ATI Radeon HD 2400 handles medium graphics 7% better than the Nvidia ION chip in the Asus EB101, but both run at over 30 frames per second, which is the standard for playing movies.

Now we come to the memory test. It should be noted the Asus EB1012 has 2GB DDR2-800MHz while Asrock A330GC has 4GB DDR2-533MHz. Here are the results:

In the Memory – Large RAM test, Asrock A330GC is better at allocating larger memory blocks than Asus EB1012. However, the Asrock A330GC does feature twice as much RAM, thus allowing it to allocate more than Asus EB1012.

This is probably also the reason why Asrock A330GC scores 271.5 in Memory Mark and Asus EB1012 only scores 238.5.

Next comes the hard drive test in the EeeBox PC EB1012. See the results directly below:

The hard drive in the EeeBox PC EB1012 is clearly faster than that in the Asrock A330GC.

Here are all the Mark ratings to give you an overview over the benchmark results. The Mark rating is the overall score in each individual benchmark (the very first score in each benchmark). Here is the result:

The Asrock A330GC wins the memory test, most likely because it features 4GB of RAM vs only 2 in the EeeBox PC EB1012. However, the EeeBox scores an overall Passmark Rating that is 23.9% better than Asrock A330GC.