| Article Index |
|---|
| Asus Eee 1005P |
| Specifications |
| Construction & Design |
| Construction & Design continued |
| Special Features |
| Benchmark |
| Benchmark cotinued |
| Conclusion |
| All Pages |
Benchmark
CPU-Z & GPU-Z
Comparison
The device is pitted against Asus Eee 1000H, a slightly older model in the Eee series. The computer has the following specifications:
Intel Atom, N270, 1.6GHz, 512KB L2 Cache, 533MHz FSB
Intel i945GME, 82801GHM ICH7-M/U Southbridge
1.024MB DDR2, PC5300 RAM, 667MHz, ASint Technology
Intel i945GME, med 8MB DDR2 RAM
160GB HDD, 2.5" SATA, 8MB cache, 5400RPM
10", WSGA TFT, resolution of 1024x600 pixels
6 Cell, 6600mAh
Windows XP Home Edition
You can read a review of it here:
http://www.laptop-review.eu
Windows Experience Index
The base rating is set by the lowest sub-rating, which in this case is “Processor – calculations per second”. 2.4 points are not particularly impressive compared to say a standard core 2 Duo Processor. However, the upside is lower power consumption.
Boot times and out of standby
The computer starts up in about 35 seconds – very reasonable. However, the 1000H model only takes 22-28 seconds, so there is quite a difference.
Battery life
Idle test settings
Brightness: 1/16, HDD standby after 10 minutes and WiFi active.
Classic test settings
Brightness: 16/16, HDD standby after 10 minutes and WiFi active.
1005P lasts a whopping 9 hours and 47 minutes with WiF active – it may only be idle, but impressive nonetheless. Under classic settings it lasts about 4 hours and 53 minutes, which is still pretty good at full performance but also a greater loss in comparison to idle. Anyway, the key point is that you can clearly see the evolution from earlier to newer models.
Processor
wPrime 2.0
The computers goes through the wPrime test in 111.89 seconds, which is not very good. That also means that performance still does not match up to the average, modern laptop.
SisSandra Processor Arithmetic & Multi-Media
In the Arithmetic test, the program outputs MIPS per second (Million instructions per second) and Mega Flops per second (One million floating point operations per second) in the Multi-Media test. In both cases, a higher score is better.
As can be seen, the N450 CPU performs slightly better in both tests, but the difference is really quite small.
Add your comments





